Was Stephen Hawking a Bornagain Christian
Stephen Hawking, a world-renowned physicist, said recently in an interview that there is no God. (Source: CNET)
Hawking didn't say that he doesn't believe in God, he said that in that location is no God.
So when I read the article, naturally, I was upset.
Why?
Because there are and then many people who are putting their trust in this man for truth, and he is failing them in a large way!
And so that's why in this blog post, I'g going to show yous five reasons why I believe Hawking is expressionless wrong about the being of God.
If yous're an atheist or an agnostic, and so this blog mail service will requite you some points to consider.
And if y'all exercise believe in God, and so this blog post volition assist y'all answer objections when defending your organized religion.
Our school and our authorities is trying to take God out of everyday life. Our society is becoming more atheistic everyday.
That'due south why we need to stand for the truth, and tell people that at that place is a God in sky who loves them.
I know a matter or two about this subject considering I'm a old atheist myself.
5 Reasons Why I Think Stephen Hawking is Wrong Nigh God
1. Stephen Hawking Doesn't Take Absolute Noesis
What stumped me the most about Hawking saying that there is no God, is that he makes a mistake that only newbie or uninformed atheists make.
Using logic, it's impossible to prove that something or someone doesn't exist.
When you talk with atheists, and y'all enquire them to prove that there's no God, most will tell you that it's logically impossible to prove that God doesn't exist.
And they are absolutely correct!
No i can prove, using logic, that something or someone that's invisible doesn't exist. That'due south because information technology would crave absolute cognition.
Here's an instance of accented knowledge.
For example, let'southward say I make the argument, "There are no hamburgers in Kansas."
How would I exist able to testify that?
Well, I would need to become to every single restaurant, home, and grocery store in Kansas, and look for hamburgers.
If I notice just one hamburger, then my argument virtually hamburgers non existing in Kansas would be wrong.
Additionally, if I become to a grocery shop that doesn't take hamburgers, just they go hamburgers five minutes subsequently I leave, then I would likewise be incorrect about my argument.
So y'all see, I would need to exist omnipresent. That means that I would need to accept the ability to be present everywhere at the same time.
This is why statements like Hawking's about at that place beingness no God is foolish.
For someone to brand an absolute statement similar, "There is no God," yous would need not only to be omnipresent, just yous'd also need to exist omniscient.
Someone that's omniscient is someone who has 100% knowledge of all the knowledge in the universe.
You and I maybe have 2% or 3% of all the knowledge in the world at best.
And so for Stephen Hawking to make the absolute statement that there's no God, is quite a misstatement.
That's because Hawking is neither omniscient or omnipresent. These are the two qualities that are needed to brand such an absolute statement like Hawking'due south.
An Atheist Changes His Listen about God
That reminds me of a video that I saw recently.
Nick Berryman is an engineer that was an atheist since his college years.
He didn't think that there was any compelling evidence that a God existed. Simply and then something inverse.
A friend of his began to talk to him about God. This is Nick'southward story.
Click here if you can't see the video.
two. A God is Necessary to Explain the Law of Gravity
Stephen Hawking is quoted in his volume, The Grand Blueprint,every bit saying:
"Considering there is a law such as gravity, the universe tin and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous cosmos is the reason at that place is something rather than nada, why the universe exists, why we exist."
I accost why I, and many others, know that this argument is wrong in the article nigh the best proof for the existence of God.
Basically, it boils down to two things:
1. The police of gravity isn't "null" like Hawking refers to in his book. It's "something."
2.Where did the law of gravity come up from?
The fact that there is a law of gravity in the first place points to the beingness of a serial of laws that govern the universe.
The laws of the universe were created by God, and no one else. Click To Tweet
Some people volition contend that aliens might be the ones responsible for creating these laws.
I address that objection besides in my commodity about the all-time proof for the being of God.
The Best Argument For the Existence of God According to the Late Atheist Christopher Hitchins
It's fascinating to note that the best statement for the existence of God comes from scientific discipline itself.
Here, watch this 5 minute video to see what I mean.
three. A God is Necessary to Explain the Laws of Logic
How can we know whether a argument is rational or irrational?
The answer is past using the laws of logic. Without the laws of logic, we wouldn't exist able to know whether a argument is true or faux.
Here are some of the laws of logic that we use every 24-hour interval without even knowing information technology:
ane. The Police force of Identity
This law states that A is A.
For example, a book is a volume. It has a front cover, a back embrace, and pages in the middle.
This may sound simplistic, but this law is necessary for us to know that nosotros are reasoning rationally.
2. The Constabulary of Non-Contradiction
This constabulary states that something can't exist both true and false at the same time, and in the same manner.
For example, I can't say, "Yesterday, I had dinner with my wife," and also say, "Yesterday, I didn't take dinner with my wife."
The constabulary of not-contradiction tells us that it'due south impossible for both of these statements to be true.
3. The Law of Excluded Centre
The law of excluded heart says that a statement is either true or false.
For example, consider the statement, "I accept at least one brown eye." That statement is either true or false, there is no middle position.
Christians believe that the laws of logic come from God.
God is the standard for truth, and He'southward the 1 that has given u.s.a. these laws to be able to reason properly.
If we didn't accept the laws of logic, then we wouldn't be able to know the deviation between true and imitation statements.
In fact, Hawking wouldn't even be able to know whether whatever of his statements are true or false if it weren't for the laws of logic.
For more than information nearly this topic, bank check out Matt Slick's article on Carm.
4. Everything That Was Brought into Existence Had a Cause
The universe began to exist at a certain point in time.
Since we know that it's impossible that the universe created itself, then information technology must take had a Creator.
When atheists enquire, "Well then, who created God? Someone must take created Him too."
And so I answer, "No i created God. He is eternal, He has ever existed."
There must always be an uncaused first crusade that created everything that began to exist.
So Stephen Hawking'south statement that there is no God is obviously imitation.
5. Y'all Can't Measure God Through Science
Science is the study of the physical and natural earth.
But God, by definition, is not express to the concrete and natural world.
In fact, God lives exterior of fourth dimension and space.
"Behold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain You lot."
-1 Kings 8:27
Therefore, a physical detection of God using scientific measurement isn't possible.
So when atheists say that they desire absolute show that God exists, I usually ask them what they desire that show to exist.
I recently had a conversation with a couple of atheists. One of them was a really nice guy named Patrick.
Patrick said that if he was to believe in the God of the Bible, so he would want to see evidence for a global alluvion.
A few other atheists chimed in and it turned out to be a pretty interesting conversation. Beneath is that chat that I had on Google Plus.
Simply click on the comments button beneath in order to reveal the comments from Google Plus. Then aggrandize the comments using the downwardly arrow.
Atheists Desire Different Signs in Order to Believe in God
I spoke to another atheist recently who told me that if God would show up right adjacent to him while walking down the street, and then he would become a laic.
Simply the problem is that every skeptic wants their own sign in order to believe in God.
The atheist that wants for God to evidence up right side by side to him, won't have the sign that the other atheist wants for evidence for a flood.
Multiply that by millions of skeptics worldwide, and you get millions of signs that skeptics enquire God to do.
That'southward why God gave us only ii universal signs for His beingness.
1. Creation – "The heavens declare the celebrity of God; the skies proclaim the work of His easily." -Psalm 19:one
2. The Censor – You have a conscience that tells y'all what's wrong and what's right.
It doesn't hateful that y'all e'er follow your conscience, or do what it says. But that censor was given to yous by God, so that you lot can know right from wrong.
Stephen Hawking is Wrong Nearly God
I think part of the problem is that Stephen Hawking is said to have one of the highest IQ's in the world.
Then naturally, people volition tend to trust in what he has to say.
However, while Stephen Hawking might be a bang-up physicist, he isn't qualified to make accented statements about God'due south existence.
You tin can put your trust in someone that'due south smarter than you, but that person tin still be wrong. Click To Tweet
And then while Stephen Hawking might have an extraordinarily high IQ, there's someone who has an IQ that'south college than Hawking's.
This Person'south IQ is off the charts!
Believe in God, He exists, and He loves yous.
Source: https://notashamedofthegospel.com/apologetics/stephen-hawking-wrong-about-god/
Post a Comment for "Was Stephen Hawking a Bornagain Christian"